Independent UK insurance research · updated regularly Information only · not financial advice · introducer disclosures in footer
Private Health (PMI) · Underwriting · 2026

Moratorium vs full medical underwriting (FMU) for UK private health insurance

When you take out private medical insurance you choose how the insurer handles your medical history. The two main options — moratorium and full medical underwriting — decide what is asked up front and how pre-existing conditions are treated. Here is how each works and who each tends to suit.

The essentials in 30 seconds

  • Moratorium: no medical questions up front; recent pre-existing conditions are excluded at the start, but many can become covered once you have been symptom-, treatment- and advice-free for a set period — commonly around two years.
  • Full medical underwriting (FMU): you disclose your medical history when you apply, and the insurer tells you exactly what is covered and excluded from day one.
  • Trade-off: moratorium is quicker to set up; FMU gives certainty up front and can suit complex or long-standing histories.
  • Neither is ‘better’: the right choice depends on your health history and how much clarity you want before you buy.

Moratorium vs full medical underwriting

ConsiderationMoratoriumFull medical underwriting (FMU)
Medical questions up front?No — you answer little or nothing about your history when you applyYes — you complete a medical questionnaire and disclose your history
How pre-existing conditions are treatedRecent conditions are excluded at the start under a standard look-back (often the past few years)Each disclosed condition is assessed individually and either covered, excluded or covered on special terms
The “symptom-free” ruleAn excluded condition can typically become covered once you have been free of symptoms, treatment, medication and advice for a continuous period — commonly around two yearsNot applicable — the cover position for each condition is fixed at outset
Clarity from day oneLower — whether a future claim is covered may depend on your recent history at the time you claimHigher — you know exactly what is and is not covered before the policy starts
Speed to set upFaster — fewer questions, so cover can usually be arranged quicklySlower — the questionnaire and assessment take longer to complete
Who it tends to suitPeople in generally good health who want minimal paperwork and a quick startPeople with a known or complex history who want certainty about exclusions up front

Indicative comparison for orientation only — not a quote or advice. Exact look-back periods, the moratorium ‘clear’ period and how conditions are assessed vary by insurer and policy wording.

The moratorium ‘clear period’ explained

Under moratorium underwriting you generally are not asked detailed medical questions when you apply. Instead, the policy automatically excludes conditions you have had within a defined look-back window before the start date. The key feature is that these exclusions are not always permanent: a previously excluded condition can become eligible for cover once you have gone a continuous period — commonly around two years — without symptoms, treatment, medication or medical advice for it.

Because nothing is assessed at outset, the cover position for a given condition is effectively decided at the point you claim, based on your recent history at that time. That keeps the application quick but means there is less certainty in advance. For the wider picture on what PMI does and does not pay for, see the private health insurance hub.

Full medical underwriting and certainty up front

With full medical underwriting you disclose your medical history when you apply, usually by completing a health questionnaire. The insurer reviews it and confirms, before cover begins, exactly which conditions are covered, which are excluded, and whether any apply on special terms. This gives you certainty from day one: there is no waiting to see whether a future claim will be accepted.

FMU often suits people with a long-standing or complex medical history, or anyone who simply wants to know where they stand before committing. The trade-off is a longer, more detailed application. Whichever route you take, comparing the cover, hospital list and exclusions matters as much as the headline price — start at the private health hub to weigh up your options.

Underwriting FAQs

Moratorium underwriting asks little or nothing about your history up front and automatically excludes recent pre-existing conditions, some of which can become covered later once you have been clear of them for a set period. Full medical underwriting asks you to disclose your history when you apply, and the insurer confirms exactly what is covered and excluded from the start.
A condition excluded at the start of a moratorium policy can typically become covered once you have gone a continuous period — commonly around two years — without symptoms, treatment, medication or medical advice for it. The exact length and conditions of this ‘clear period’ vary by insurer, so always check the policy wording.
Generally not at outset. Under moratorium, recent pre-existing conditions are excluded but some may become covered later under the clear-period rule. Under full medical underwriting, each disclosed condition is assessed individually and may be covered, excluded, or covered on special terms. Long-standing or chronic conditions are commonly excluded by both routes.
Moratorium is usually faster because there are few or no medical questions to answer, so cover can often be arranged quickly. Full medical underwriting involves completing a health questionnaire and waiting for the insurer to assess it, which takes longer but gives certainty about exclusions before cover begins.
Yes. Because you disclose your history up front, the insurer confirms exactly what is and is not covered before the policy starts. There is no waiting to see whether a future claim will be accepted, which is why FMU often suits people with a known or complex medical history who value clarity.
It depends on the insurer and your circumstances. Some allow a change at renewal or when switching provider, but moving to full underwriting may mean disclosing your history afresh, and exclusions can be reassessed. Always confirm how any change affects continuing cover for conditions you already have before switching.
There is no universal answer. Moratorium tends to suit people in generally good health who want minimal paperwork and a quick start, while full medical underwriting suits those with a known or complex history who want certainty up front. This is general information, not advice — compare the policy wording and consider your own health history before deciding.

Information only — not financial advice. Details are indicative and simplified to aid understanding; moratorium clear periods, look-back windows and underwriting terms vary by insurer and policy wording. My Insurance Expert is not an FCA-authorised intermediary and does not arrange or sell policies. Last updated: 2026-06-13